I have so many questions:
Why do poets confess the loves
they cannot bear
in public? Why do they trala
lalalala upon the page
while making impossible
the flesh that breathes
in the next room?
Does the flower wear a feminine
or masculine face or is it genderless?
Is the blue dahlia
a figurative expression
for what is
impossible
or unattainable,
which is to say like many species
of love having indeterminate ends,
for not all love tends to bed
but may end itself
in suicidal flowers? Is, in fact, the word "dahlia"
the name for "a particular shade
of red"? Does she love red?
She says, and wears it, the rings
holding her blouse together also
make her breasts more noticeable
and more bare for being broken
by iron rings. And how can the eye
not look and love the sweet pores
of the animal flesh, so poor
in its alienating
isolations? Why does
the man she walks beside
have my face; why do I introduce
myself to myself
in another's mirror?
Was it true, as the philosophers said,
that all love is but the reflection
of an ideal form
that finds itself in many faces,
mirrored in this gender
or aspect, but always
the same serious
tiger of the flesh, growling
and turning itself to butter? And if the universe
should rip open its seams to all impossibles
who would we be? in bed with whom
or in what blue dahlia beds?